Legal Opinion

Cox v. Albemarle Drainage District

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The defendant, J. L. Roper Lumber Company, made a motion in the court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit, which was allowed. O. S., 561. Upon the record we think this was correct. The plaintiffs then submitted to judgment as in case of nonsuit against tbe Albemarle Drainage District, on'the ground that if a judgment could be obtained it would be uncollectible on account of insolvency.

The land of the plaintiff, Louisa Cox, is in the Pantego Drainage District. She is bound by the decree made in the proceeding establishing the Pantego Drainage District. It appears that the J. L. Roper…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bunn v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. First National Bank of Spring Hope v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Lentz v. . LentzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. . McKaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API