Mangiapane v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.
Sheldon Paul Mangiapane attempts to bring this appeal from his conviction of theft by receiving. We do not address the argument raised by appellant because we conclude that he failed to perfect his appeal under Ark. R. App. P. 4.
Appellant was charged with theft by receiving and was found guilty after a jury trial on June 18,1992. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on June 22, 1992, at 8:37 a.m. However, the judgment of conviction was not entered until 8:45 a.m. on June 22.
Rule 4(a) of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that “a notice of appeal shall…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- State v. JoshuaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Magness v. Commerce Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
- Hawkins v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Kimble v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Banning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
- Mangiapane v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Anderson v. Seward Luggage Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.