Legal Opinion

Kimble v. Gray

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 1, 1991No. 92-1486PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted Rhonda Kimble’s petition for review of the court of appeals’ per curiam granting dismissal of her appeal. Appellee, now respondent, Robert Gray, Sr., previously asked the court of appeals to determine that Kimble had failed to file a timely appeal. The court of appeals found Kimble had filed her notice of appeal one day too early, and under the terms of Rule 4(c) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, the court held Kimble’s notice of appeal had no effect. The court of appeals’ per curiam, Kimble v. Gray, Sr., 40 Ark. App. 196, 842 S.W.2d 473 (1992), succinctly sets out that court’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kimble v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lawrence Bros., Inc. v. RJ" Bob" Jones Excavating Contractor, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Mangiapane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Glover v. LangfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Chickasaw Chemical Co. v. BeasleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Glass v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API