Legal Opinion

Mangiapane v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 4, 1993No. CA CR 92-1079PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Sheldon Paul Mangiapane, the appellant in this case, moves for permission to file a belated appeal pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 36.9. In support of his motion he shows this court that he filed his notice of appeal at 8:37 a.m. on June 22,1992, and judgment was not entered until eight minutes later at 8:45 a.m. on that same date. The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal on July 7, 1993, for the reason that the notice of appeal was prematurely filed, and, accordingly, the appeal was not properly lodged. Mangiapane v. State, 43 Ark. App. 19, 858 S.W.2d 128 (1993). The Court of Appeals then…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. State v. JoshuaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Mangiapane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pannell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Gidron v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Harl Garrett v. Dexter PayneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API