Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. City of Shaker Heights

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1987No. 86-561PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The issues presented for our resolution are twofold. First, we must determine the propriety of the standing of one municipality to challenge the actions of a neighboring municipality in partially closing *51several streets to the financial detriment of the complainant. If standing exists, we must then resolve whether injunctive relief is available to thé complaining municipality on the theory that the street closings were either clearly unreasonable, an abuse of discretion or taken in bad faith.

We reject Shaker’s contention that appellees lacked standing to challenge the traffic plan. In the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. City of Middletown v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Eastland Woods v. City of TallmadgeOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Cincinnati Motor Transportation Ass'n v. City of Lincoln HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. SchwartzwaldOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Home Builders Ass'n v. City of BeavercreekOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bank of Am. v. KuchtaOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. LaSalle Bank Natl. Assn. v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Thies v. WheelockOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API