P. Silverman & Son v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Code, Judge:
Byproducts of wool, including different kinds of wool waste, have been the subject of much customs litigation, the last expression being P. Silverman & Son v. United States, 27 C. C. P. A. 324, C. A. D. 107. In that case the court not only reviewed a’ line of decisions involving different issues relating to the tariff classification of wastes composed of wool, but also discussed very thoroughly the legislative history of the provisions for wool wastes in paragraph 1105 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed. § 1001, par. 1105), emphasizing that “in all the history of our…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Latimer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Akeroyd v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Seeberger v. CastroSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Harley Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni Imperial Rug Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966