Legal Opinion

Misso v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 1911No. 965PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

—Appellant was charged under article 213 of the Penal Code with having, after being a witness before the grand jury, divulged matters about which he was interrogated while before the grand jury.

It is unnecessary to copy the indictment. It does charge, among other things, that after appellant came from before the grand jury, he told one or more parties that the grand jurors had asked him in regard to gaming, and that he had stated before the grand jury that he knew nothing of card playing except one game he had played with some brick masons. The indictment recites…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Goodman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. State v. RevereSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  3. De Friend v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Hamilton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Focke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API