Legal Opinion

Focke v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1912No. 1378PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The State’s testimony showed that there was a large amount of meat hanging in defendant’s butcher shop, and lying on the counter which had no protection from dust, vermin, or flies; that the floor was covered with dust, and that the screen door was continually being opened and shut as people went in and out of the shop, and that the wind was blowing strong.

1Opinion of the Court

HARPER, Judge.

This case was tried in the County Court at Law in Dallas County on complaint and information charging appellant' with violation of the provisions of the Pure Food Law, in that he was engaged in business as a butcher and left his meats exposed. When tried, the jury found appellant guilty and assessed his punishment at a fine • of $50, from which judgment he prosecutes this appeal.

Appellant was tried on the 9th day of September, 1910, the term of court adjourning on the 31st day of October, the day' on which his motion for new trial was overruled. The court granted twenty days…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Martin, Wise & FitzhughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  2. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. Misso v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Memphis Cotton Oil Co. v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Ex Parte DraneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Winkie v. ConatserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API