Legal Opinion
Detroit Edison Co. v. Public Service Commission No. 2
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 2004No. Docket No. 243268PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.
I
Detroit Edison Company appeals the Public Service Commission’s order that approved deferred recovery of implementation expenses of $27,225,289 that Detroit Edison incurred during the year 2000 to establish the retail open access (ROA) program. Detroit Edison appeals the PSC’s order because the PSC deferred ultimate recovery of the 2000 implementation costs pending further reviews by the PSC. We remand for further proceedings.1
ii
Initially, the PSC established the ROA, under which retail customers of electric utilities may purchase electricity from alternative suppliers. After our Supreme…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Consumers Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Ameritech Michigan v. PSC MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMM'NMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Ass'n of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Consumers Energy Co. v. Public Service Commission No. 2Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- Consumers Energy Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Consumers Energy Co. v. Public Service Commission No. 2Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Detroit Edison Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Detroit Edison Co. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COM'NMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004