Legal Opinion

Consumers Energy Co. v. Public Service Commission No. 2

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 2004No. Docket No. 243360PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.

i

Consumers Energy Company (Consumers) appeals from the Michigan Public Service Commission’s order that approved the 1999 implementation expenses incurred by Consumers to establish a retail open access (ROA) program, but which deferred recovery and held that these implementation expenses could be adjusted upon further review. We remand for further proceedings.1

ii

Under the ROA program, retail customers of electric utilities can choose to purchase electricity from suppliers other than Consumers. However, the electricity generated by these alternative suppliers would be transmitted to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Consumers Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Ameritech Michigan v. PSC MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMM'NMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. In Re Procedure & Format for Filing Tariffs Under the Michigan Telecommunications ActMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Detroit Edison Co. v. Public Service Commission No. 2Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Detroit Edison Co. ApplicationMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Detroit Edison Co. v. Public Service Commission No. 2Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Detroit Edison Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Consumers Energy Co. v. MICHIGAN PSCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API