People v. Kelly
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BALLANTYNE, J.—
Introduction
Defendant, David Bryan Kelly, was convicted by a jury of 17 felony counts of various sex crimes involving 2 young boys.
Prior to trial defendant made a motion for the psychiatric examination of one of the victims, James R., which was denied.
The defendant made a motion for new trial based on several grounds, including juror misconduct. The motion was denied.
Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal and raises three issues on his appeal.
Discussion
I
Was Defendant Denied a Fair Trial Because One of the Jurors Failed to Disclose During Voir Dire That She Had Been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. DiazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. CastaldiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re HitchingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. BlackwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Jutzi v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. Warner CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2015