Legal Opinion

People v. Kelly

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 1986No. F004833PublishedCited by 5 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BALLANTYNE, J.—

Introduction

Defendant, David Bryan Kelly, was convicted by a jury of 17 felony counts of various sex crimes involving 2 young boys.

Prior to trial defendant made a motion for the psychiatric examination of one of the victims, James R., which was denied.

The defendant made a motion for new trial based on several grounds, including juror misconduct. The motion was denied.

Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal and raises three issues on his appeal.

Discussion

I

Was Defendant Denied a Fair Trial Because One of the Jurors Failed to Disclose During Voir Dire That She Had Been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. DiazCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. CastaldiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In Re HitchingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. BlackwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Jutzi v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. People v. Warner CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API