Legal Opinion

People v. Castaldia

California Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1959No. Crim. 6351PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Defendant appeals, after a jury trial, from (1) a judgment finding him guilty of accepting a bet on a horse race, contrary to the provisions of section 337a, subdivision 6, of the Penal Code, and (2) an order denying his motion for a new trial.

IP acts: During the voir dire examination of the jury, juror Angela R. Kennedy, in response to questions of defendant’s counsel, stated that there was nothing in the nature of a bookmaking case to cause her to hesitate to sit as a juror; that if some of the evidence took place in a bar it would not prejudice her in any manner; that she would not suffer…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kollert v. CundiffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. NewsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Williams v. BridgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. GallowayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Sherwin v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. BalderasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. TavaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. People v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. In Re HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. In Re HitchingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API