Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 8, 1996No. 67931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James M. Porter, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Pamela E. Hill appeals from her conviction following a jury trial for voluntary manslaughter (R.C. 2903.03). Defendant contends that the trial court erred in charging the jury on voluntary manslaughter over her objection although she had been indicted for murder and had claimed self-defense and in allowing the coroner to testify to matters set forth in the coroner’s report. Defendant also contends that her conviction was against the manifest weight of the evidence and not supported by sufficient evidence. We find merit to the appeal and reverse and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. DeemOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. ShaneOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. TylerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. KidderOhio Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. State v. JeffersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. State v. Livingston, 88714 (7-19-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API