Legal Opinion
Norman v. Elkin
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 26, 2012No. C.A. No. 06-005-LPSPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STARK, District Judge:
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion to Alter or Amend the Jury Verdict, or in the alternative, Motion for a New Trial. (D.I. 159) For the reasons discussed below, the Court will grant Plaintiffs Motion for a New Trial.
I. BACKGROUND1
Plaintiff Jeffery M. Norman (“Plaintiff’) filed this action in the Delaware Court of Chancery on December 2, 2005, asserting nine causes of action against defendants David W. Elkin, Richard M. Sorkin, and The Elkin Group, Inc. (“Defendants”): fraud, breach of contract, conversion/misappropriation, breach of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Frew Ex Rel. Frew v. HawkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Atlantic Sounding Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jeffrey Norman v. David ElkinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Evonik Degussa GMBH v. Materia, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- Norman v. ElkinDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- In re EstradaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Jeffrey Norman v. David ElkinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.