Schutt v. Federal Land Bank
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Per curiam
A controversy arose in the' trial court as to whether this action was one triable by a jury under §§ 7608 and 7609, Comp. Laws 1913, or whether the action was an equitable one and properly triable, by the court without a jury. Gresens v. Martin, 27 ND 231, 145 NW 823; Avery Mfg. Co. v. Crumb, 14 ND 57, 103 NW 410. Plaintiff’s counsel contended that the action was oiíe triable to a jury and that it must be 'tried to a jury. Defendant’s counsel on the other hand contended that the case -was one properly triable to the court without a jury. The district court ruled that it was an equitable…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stimson v. StimsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Ellingson v. Northwestern Jobbers Credit BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Burdick v. MannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- Power v. WilliamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Detwiler v. LowdenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nicola v. MeisnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- Rude v. LetnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Blue Arm v. VolkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Ferguson v. JensenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
- Sand v. Queen City Packing CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.