Legal Opinion

Randolph v. Edmonds

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson

Plaintiff in error, Sally Randolph, obtained a judgment by default in 1940 against defendant in error, H. D. Ed-monds, for personal injuries received as a result of a collision on a public highway of the automobile being driven by Edmonds with the automobile in which Miss Randolph was riding. The cause was heard by 'the cir- cult judge of Davidson County without the intervention of a jury. The finding and judgment of the court, in so far as material to the question which must he determined upon this appeal, is as follows :

“Upon due consideration thereof, the Court finds in favor of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Knoxville Traction Co. v. LaneTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Stagner v. CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Fleshman v. TrolingerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  4. Marbry v. CainTennessee Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Seminole Pipeline Co., MAPCO, Inc. v. Broad Leaf Partners, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  2. Leonard v. Collins (In Re Collins)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1979
  3. Seward v. GatlinTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Universal CIT Credit Corporation v. WoodmanseeTennessee Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API