Universal CIT Credit Corporation v. Woodmansee
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Felts
This appeal presents a controversy as to whether a judgment recovered by appellant on a promissory note of appellee was discharged by his discharge in bankruptcy. The Chancellor held it was. Appellant insists it was not, because it was based on a note that was based on a liability that was not dischargeable in bankruptcy.
Appellant filed its bill October 22, 1959, in the Chancery Court of Shelby County, Tennessee, alleging appel-lee was indebted to it on his note dated August 15, 1955, for $4,970.00, with interest and attorney’s fees, exhibiting the note, which stated: “For value received, I…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Boynton v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Kreitlein v. FergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Arrowood v. McMinn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Poss (In Re Poss)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1982