Legal Opinion

Electrical Products Consolidated v. El Campo, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1937No. 7,662PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Cascade county, rendered on a verdict directed by the court in favor of plaintiff, Electrical Products Consolidated, a corporation, respondent here. Plaintiff sought to recover from El Campo, Inc., a corporation, defendant and appellant, $525, with interest and attorney’s fees, as damages resulting from the breach of an alleged written contract.

The contract was entered into by Charles Day, as manager of defendant corporation, and the Electrical Products Corporation, the alleged assignor of plaintiff. It purported to be one for the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Maki v. Murray HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Consolidated Gold & Sapphire Mining Co. v. StruthersMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. McKay v. Montana Union Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. State Ex Rel. Matson v. O'HernMontana Supreme Court · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schulz v. PeakeMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Myhre v. MyhreMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Audit Services, Inc. v. Elmo Road Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Glick v. KnollMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Potlatch Oil & Refining Co. v. Ohio Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API