Legal Opinion
Potlatch Oil & Refining Co. v. Ohio Oil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 3, 1952No. 13010PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, plaintiffs below, brought this action to procure an accounting of amounts alleged to be due them from the appelleedefendant under the terms of a so-called “Operating Agreement”. This agreement was executed June 15, 1922 by the trustees of a “common law trust” known as TroySweetgrass Oil Syndicate, and the defendant Ohio Oil Company. On the same date the Syndicate assigned to Ohio Oil Company, here called Ohio, a 55 percent interest in certain oil and gas leases covering lands in Toole County, Montana. By the Operating Agreement Ohio undertook to develop the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wright v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Riley v. BlackerMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- Langston v. CurrieMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Cox v. WilliamsonMontana Supreme Court · 1951
- Phelps v. Union Central Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Frederick H. Hope v. Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc., the Hearst Corporation and Igor CassiniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- R. H. Colvin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Worthington Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Lease Management, Inc., a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Frederick H. Hope v. Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc., the Hearst Corporation and Igor CassiniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Hansen v. KiernanMontana Supreme Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.