State v. Tillery
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
When a warrant or bill of indictment, which charges the unlawful possession and unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor, describes the liquor as “non-tax-paid,” conviction may be had, as the evidence may warrant, either under the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, G.S. Ch. 18, Article 3, or under the Turlington Act, G.S. Ch. 18, Article 1. These statutes are construed in pari materia. S. v. Hill, 236 N.C. 704, 73 S.E. 2d 894; S. v. Gibbs, 238 N.C. 258, 77 S.E. 2d 779.
Even so, when the warrant or bill of indictment describes the liquor as “non-tax-paid liquor,” these descriptive words…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- State v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958