Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court below to sustain her motion for judgment as of nonsuit.

We have heretofore held that testimony to the effect that the liquor seized was white liquor was insufficient to sustain a count charging the defendant with the unlawful possession of “illegal nontaxpaid liquor.” S. v. Wolf, 230 N.C. 268, 52 S.E. 2d 920.

We have likewise held “the court cannot take judicial notice that 'bootleg whiskey' is nontaxpaid liquor.” S. v. Tillery, 243 N.C. 706, 92 S.E. 2d 64.

In the instant case the liquor is described by the State’s witness as “nontaxpaid…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. State v. TillerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. State v. WolfSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HamlinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API