Legal Opinion

Borg-Johnson Electronics, Inc. v. Christenberry

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 19, 1959PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

These are cross motions for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., in an action seeking to enjoin enforcement of a fraud order issued by the Postmaster' General. The order directed that mail addressed to the plaintiff corporation be returned to the senders marked “Fraudulent”; and that postal money orders payable to its order be returned to the remitters. Both parties agree that there are no triable issues of fact and that either one or the other is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.

The fraud…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Marcello v. BondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Shaughnessy v. PedreiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Donaldson v. Read Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Leach v. CarlileSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kelly v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1972
  2. Go Leasing, Inc. v. National Transportation Safety Board & Donald D. Engen, Administrator, Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Stieberger v. HecklerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  4. Grove Press, Inc. v. ChristenberryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  5. United States Bio-Genics Corp. v. ChristenberryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API