Legal Opinion

Vushaj v. Farm Bureau General Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 2009No. Docket 283243PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s grant of defendant’s motion for summary disposition. Plaintiff filed suit after defendant denied a claim arising out of a fire at a house owned by plaintiff. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary disposition after determining that plaintiff was not entitled to coverage because the house in question was vacant before the fire. We affirm.

I. STANDARD OF REVIEW

This Court reviews a trial court’s ruling on a motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10) de novo. Dressel v Ameribank, 468 Mich 557, 561; 664 NW2d 151…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Henderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Dressel v. AmeribankMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Corley v. Detroit Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Stanton v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Auto-Owners Insurance v. SeilsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. McGrath v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. McNeel v. Farm Bureau General InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. D'Agostini Land Company LLC v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. King v. Oakland County ProsecutorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API