Haller v. Mecklenburg Highway Commission
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
The appellant contends that tbe award of the Industrial Commission should be set aside for two reasons: (1) The Workmen’s Compensation Act (P. L. 1929, ch. 120) is in conflict with the Constitution, Article YU, sec. 7, which provides that “no county, city, town or other municipal corporation shall contract any debt, pledge its faith or loan its credit, nor shall any tax be levied or collected by any officer of the same except for the necessary expenses thereof, unless by a vote of the majority of the qualified voters therein”; (2) the act deprives, the defendant of its right to a trial by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mountain Timber Company v. State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Groves v. . WareSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- McInnish v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Annexation Ordinances Nos. 866-870, Etc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- In Re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Lee v. . American Enka Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Kaperonis v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.