Legal Opinion
In Re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of Charlotte
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 25, 1974No. 90PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*451HUSKINS, Justice.
Petitioner assigns as error the denial of her motion for a jury trial incident to review of the annexation proceeding. She contends the constitutional questions involved in this proceeding are matters with respect to which she is entitled to trial by jury and that the provisions of G.S. 160-453.18 (f) (now G.S. 160A-50(f)) relating to review without a jury are (1) violative of Article I, Section 25 of the Constitution of North Carolina and (2) are superseded by the Rules of Civil Procedure.
The provisions of Article I, Section 25 of the present Constitution of North Carolina…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. . BarksdaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Hobbs v. County of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Huntley v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Utilities Commission v. . Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Underwood v. HowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Taylor v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Food Town Stores, Inc. v. City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- In Re the Appeal From the Denial of the Application to DredgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Conover v. NewtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.