Legal Opinion

Mississippi High School Activities Association, Inc. v. Richard Rusty Trail

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2015No. 2013-IA-01728-SCTPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, Presiding Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. The only issue before us is whether a high' school athlete has standing to challenge adverse decisions concerning the student’s eligibility to participate in high school athletics. We hold that he does.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2. The DeSoto County School District (“School District”) — a public, taxpayer-funded entity — entered into a ’ contract with a private entity called the Mississippi High School Activities Association (“MHSAA”).1 The terms of the contract allow MHSAA to decide whether School District students are eligible to play high…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burns v. Washington Savings & Great Southern Savings & Loan Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Yazoo M.V.R. Co. v. SideboardMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Fordice v. BryanMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  4. City of Picayune v. Southern Regional Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. Quitman CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. John Oaks v. Linda Greer BallMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Mississippi High School Activities Ass'n v. Hattiesburg High SchoolMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Don Hewitt, Advanced Technology Building Solutions, LLC and Tunica Hospitality & Entertainment, LLC v. TJM Properties, Inc., TJM Tunica, LLC, and Tunica County, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2026
  4. James v. The Cleveland School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2021
  5. Janita West v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API