Legal Opinion
Rubenstein v. Tri-State Transport, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 18, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-661-SPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SKINNER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in this ERISA action are Teamsters Local 653 and the trustees of Local 653’s Health, Welfare and Insurance Fund (“the Fund”). The Fund is a multiemployer plan. The defendants are TriState Transport, Inc. (“Tri-State”), T.S.T. Truck Leasing, Inc. (“T.S.T.”), and the principal stockholder of each, Paul B. Waitze. The plaintiffs seek enforcement of TriState’s obligation under a collective bargaining agreement with Local 653 to make contributions to the Fund. The plaintiffs now move for summary…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Donovan v. AgnewCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Ouimet Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Moyers v. Frank P. Bauer Marble Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Ziviak v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1976
3Cited by11 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades Union v. George A. Kracher, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Rockney v. BlohornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Trustees of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund v. DaninDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
- L.I. Head Start Child Development Services, Inc. v. Economic Opportunity Commission of Nassau County, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Canario v. Byrnes Exp. & Trucking Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.