Legal Opinion
Trustees of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund v. Danin
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 10, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-2503-WFPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WOLF, District Judge.
The Trustees of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund (the “Fund”), a multi-employeremployee benefit retirement plan, have brought this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., to recover delinquent payments of Vi-Mil, Inc. (“Vi-Mil”). By this action, the Fund is seeking to recover the delinquent funds from two individual defendants, Jerome Danin and Frank Fredella, the sole shareholders, officers and directors of Vi-Mil.
The Fund has previously obtained state court judgments for $192,948.43 against…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Robert C. Hahn v. Francis W. SargentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Donovan v. AgnewCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Falk v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ronald Alman, Etc. v. Jerome DaninCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- The Massachusetts Laborers' Health and Welfare Fund v. Starrett Paving Corp., Peter StarrettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Rockney v. BlohornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Brokke v. Stauffer Chemical Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
- Solomon v. R.E.K. DressDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Alman v. George Manufacturing Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.