Esling v. City National Bank & Trust Co.

Plaintiff brought suit against defendant to recover. $2,000 and interest. There was judgment for defendant and plaintiff appeals.

The facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff was either entitled to judgment for the full amount of her claim or she was entitled to nothing. A new trial in case of reversal is unnecessary. The disposition of the case depends upon a question of law. If there was error in the admission of testimony, it was error against plaintiff and in favor of defendant. We do not find it necessary to pass upon that question to dispose of the case.

Plaintiff and Hannah C. Lewis had a…