Fisher v. Fisher
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
769 A.2d 1165 (2001)
James L. FISHER, Appellee,
v.
Patricia A. FISHER, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued April 26, 1999.
Decided April 25, 2001.
Allen H. Smith, York, for Patricia A. Fisher.
Daniel M. Fennick, York, for James L. Fisher.
Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.
The sole issue in this equitable distribution case is to determine the proper disposition of employee stock options which had been granted to one spouse during coverture but had not vested[1] and could not have been exercised…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Nigro; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Saylor.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pascale v. PascaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- DeJesus v. DeJesusNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- DeMasi v. DeMasiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- In Re Marriage of HugCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Berrington v. BerringtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.