Legal Opinion

Connell v. Saco Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 10, 1950No. 37,985; No. 37,986PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*92The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

These two actions were brought by the administrator of the estate of O. J. Connell, deceased, to recover as part of the decedent’s estate corporation stock transferred' from decedent either before or after his death. They were heard together in the court below and consolidated here. Two of the defendants, M. M. Buist and F. J. Buist, demurred to plaintiff’s amended petitions. In each case the demurrer was overruled by the court. Pleadings in each case insofar as the pertinent question on appeal is concerned are identical; therefore, in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. Rideout BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Malone v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Preston v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  4. Dalton v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. Schulte v. Westborough, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Amen v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  2. Rexroad v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  3. Stratton v. Wood Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  4. A. M. Amen v. William H. Black, A. M. Amen v. William H. Black and Ruth F. Black, D. Arthur Walker and Fred D. Windish, Co-Receivers of Black-Marshall Oil Company v. William H. Black and Ruth F. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  5. Connell v. Saco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API