Legal Opinion
A. M. Amen v. William H. Black, A. M. Amen v. William H. Black and Ruth F. Black, D. Arthur Walker and Fred D. Windish, Co-Receivers of Black-Marshall Oil Company v. William H. Black and Ruth F. Black
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 19, 1956No. 4962-4964_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
234 F.2d 12
A. M. AMEN et al., Appellants,
v.
William H. BLACK, Appellee.
A. M. AMEN et al., Appellants,
v.
William H. BLACK and Ruth F. Black, Appellees.
D. Arthur WALKER and Fred D. Windish, Co-Receivers of Black-Marshall Oil Company, Appellants,
v.
William H. BLACK and Ruth F. Black, Appellees.
Nos. 4962-4964.
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.
May 4, 1956.
Rehearing En Banc Denied June 19, 1956.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED D. Arthur Walker, Arkansas City, Kan., and Martin M. Lucente, Chicago, Ill. (Jack O. Brown, Chicago, Ill., Burrel Barash, Galesburg, Ill., Robert…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Oregon State Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hawkins v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.