Legal Opinion

Egbert v. Abrams

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 3, 1935Published

1Opinion of the Court

Porter, S. C. C.

The motion in the above matter is to strike answers of certain defendants and demands for bills of particulars of certain other defendants. The suit is brought by the superintendent of banks of the State of New York against some five hundred and fifty-seven New Jersey *796stockholders of the Bank of the United States, a New York corporation, to recover assessments made against them by the said plaintiff made by him in pursuance with the authority vested in him under the statute of New York.

The Supreme Court of this state granted a motion to strike the complaint in pursuance with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Broderick v. AdamsonNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Broderick v. McGuireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Broderick v. AaronNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Broderick v. AbramsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API