Legal Opinion

McClellan v. Barrath Const. Co., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1987No. 51777PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals trial court’s order sustaining defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. We dismiss the appeal.

In March 1984, plaintiffs (Chesterfield) and defendant Barrath Construction Co., Inc. entered into a construction contract to develop certain residential real estate in St. Louis. The contract contained an arbitration clause. 1

After a contract dispute arose, Barrath, in December 1985, filed a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association. Chesterfield filed an answer and counterclaim to the arbitration demand. In February 1986, Barrath filed a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Brown v. Western R. Co. of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Ex Parte Costa and Head (Atrium), Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Village of Cairo v. Bodine Contracting Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Wells v. Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Greenwood v. SherfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Reis v. Peabody Coal Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. McCarney v. Nearing, Staats, Prelogar & JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API