Legal Opinion
Walker v. Department of Human Resources
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 11, 2004No. 49, Sept. Term, 2003PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIENER, Judge.
Title 12 of the State Personnel and Pensions Article of the Maryland Code (SPP) sets forth a grievance procedure for most Executive Branch State employees. The question before us is whether that procedure is available to resolve the particular kind of complaint filed by appellants, who are employed by the Baltimore City Department of Social Services (BCDSS), a unit of the State Department of Human Resources (DHR). An administrative law judge, acting for the State Department of Budget and Management (DBM), found that the statutory grievance procedure was not applicable and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Taylor v. NationsBank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Government Employees Insurance v. Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Wells v. Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Towson University v. ConteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Horridge v. St. Mary's County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Potomac Investment Properties, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Credible Behavioral Health v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Maryland Transportation Authority Police Lodge 34 v. Maryland Transportation AuthorityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.