Legal Opinion
Schoenholtz v. Doniger
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 14, 1986No. 83 Civ. 2740 (IBC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRVING BEN COOPER, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action alleging that defendants have breached and continue to breach fiduciary duties owed to two employee retirement plans at the Rye Psychiatric Hospital Center in Rye, New York in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. Plaintiff seeks recovery for damages to the plans, attorneys’ fees and punitive damages.
Defendants assert twelve affirmative defenses and five counterclaims generally alleging they owed no fiduciary duties with respect to the plans; that if any such duties…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Donovan v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Donovan v. BierwirthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Fine v. SemetCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Donovan v. BierwirthDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Marshall v. Teamsters Local 282 Pension Trust FundDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schoenholtz v. DonigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Clarke v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Schoenholtz v. DonigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986