Legal Opinion
Dattilo v. Tucson General Hospital
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 8, 1975No. 2 CA-CIV 1672PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
This litigation arises out of a contract between appellee Tucson General Hospital and Drs. Hallaq and Struse whereby the said doctors were given the exclusive right to provide nuclear medicine services at the hospital. The position of Drs. Rente and Kring in this case will be divulged as the facts are disclosed.
Appellant, Dr. Dattilo, an internist, sued for damages on the theory that the appellees unlawfully combined to prevent him from practicing his specialty at Tucson General Hospital and that the exclusive contract constituted an unreasonable restraint of trade…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Adler v. Montefiore Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Willis v. Santa Ana Community Hospital Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Blank v. Palo Alto-Stanford Hospital CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Milton v. Hudson Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Radiology Professional Corp. v. Trinidad Area Health Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Lewin v. St. Joseph Hospital of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Belmar v. CipollaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Gonzalez v. San Jacinto Methodist Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
- Holt v. Good Samaritan Hospital & Health CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.