Ritter v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from G-reene Circuit Court. Felix G. Taylor, Judge. The indictment is defective. Sand. & EL Dig., § 1710. It should have contained an allegation to the affect that appellant was an officer. 47 Ark. 488; 48 Ark. 76; 12 Ark. 608; 29 Ark. ■68; 32 Ark. 124; 38 Ark. 519; 43 Ark. 493; Sand. & EL Dig., •§ 1712. The indictments should have stated all the facts showing the relation between bailer and bailee. 20 Pac. 171; 26 Pac. 616; 12 S. E. 1058; 2 S. W. 223; 39 Am. 189; 6…
Read the full summary
Appeal from G-reene Circuit Court. Felix G. Taylor, Judge. The indictment is defective. Sand. & EL Dig., § 1710. It should have contained an allegation to the affect that appellant was an officer. 47 Ark. 488; 48 Ark. 76; 12 Ark. 608; 29 Ark. ■68; 32 Ark. 124; 38 Ark. 519; 43 Ark. 493; Sand. & EL Dig., •§ 1712. The indictments should have stated all the facts showing the relation between bailer and bailee. 20 Pac. 171; 26 Pac. 616; 12 S. E. 1058; 2 S. W. 223; 39 Am. 189; 6 Gray, 15; 2 N. W. 492; 36 S. E. 169; 42 S. W. 302; 1 Whar. Or. Law, 1061. The indictment should have made clear and…
1Opinion of the CourtBattle, J.
W. H. Ritter was indicted by a grand jury of the Greene circuit court, at the February term, 1901, for embezzlement. The indictment, omitting the formal parts, is as follows: “The said W. Ii. Ritter on the 14th day of December, 1900, in the county of Greene aforesaid, then and there being over the age of 16 years and being the cashier of the Greene County Bank, an incorporated company, and having in his custody and possession as such cashier as aforesaid, and then and there having come into possession as such cashier as aforesaid, $10,000, gold, silver and paper money, lawful money of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Baldwin v. Bank of NewburySupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- State v. FindleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Shepard v. GiddingsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hartzell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Havens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- People v. BurgessNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Gurley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- State v. ScogginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.