Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Arevalo-Vargas

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided March 16, 2026No. ID 4174PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

29 I&N Dec. 519

(BIA 2026) Interim Decision #4174 Matter of Audencio AREVALO-VARGAS, Respondent Decided March 16, 2026 1 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) The respondent’s children are no longer qualifying relatives for purposes of the respondent’s application for cancellation of removal because they are now over 21 years old and have therefore aged out. (2) The respondent has not demonstrated that the economic detriment, diminished educational opportunities, and emotional hardship his children may experience in the event…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. BagamasbadSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. MONREALBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2001
  3. RECINASBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
  4. Edmer Rogelio Cabrera-Alvarez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. ANDAZOLABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Torres-Casas v. BlancheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API