Legal Opinion
Blankenship v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided March 7, 1990No. 153-89PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATES’ PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CAMPBELL, Justice.
A jury convicted appellant of aggravated robbery and set punishment at 10 years imprisonment in the Texas Department of Corrections. 1 The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and remanded the case for entry of an order of acquittal. Blankenship v. State, 764 S.W.2d 22 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1989). The District Attorney petitioned this Court for review raising one ground. The State Prosecuting Attorney filed a petition raising two grounds for review. We granted both petitions to determine whether the Court of Appeals…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Stokes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Blankenship v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Little v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Hensley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
3Cited by35 opinions
- Maldonado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Blankenship v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Ricky Blankenship v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.