Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided December 1, 1992No. 05-89-01205-CRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REMAND

BAKER, Justice.

We deny the State’s first and second motions for rehearing. We withdraw our opinion of September 10, 1992. The following is now the Court’s opinion. We reverse the trial court’s judgment. We remand the cause for a new trial.

OPINION ON STATE’S FIRST MOTION FOR REHEARING

On original submission we assumed, without deciding, that after the trial began, the trial court erred by permitting the State to amend the indictment over appellant’s objection. However, we held the court’s error subject to a harm analysis. See Tex.R.App.P. 81(b)(2); Brown v. State, 800 S.W.2d…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Brasfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. Burrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Whetstone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Miller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  2. Harris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
  3. Leal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  4. Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
  5. McCoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API