Blankenship v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GRANT, Justice.
Ricky Blankenship appeals from a jury conviction for aggravated robbery. The jury assessed his punishment at ten years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.
In his sole point of error, Blankenship asserts that the trial court erred by deny ing his motion for a directed verdict and his motion for a mistrial because there was a fatal variance between the allegation of the complainant’s name in the indictment and the proof of the complainant’s name at trial. The indictment charged, in part, that Blankenship
did then and there intentionally, while in the course of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Escobar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blankenship v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Blankenship v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Ricky Blankenship v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Blankenship v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.