Legal Opinion

Davy v. Moss

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 9, 1978No. 4380-1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The question on this appeal is whether the trial court, in an action for a breach of contract, erred in refusing to allow to the prevailing party the reasonable attorney's fees called for in RCW 4.84. The answer depends upon the meaning of "action for damages." We reverse. Pertinent sections of the statute are:

Notwithstanding any other provisions of chapter 4.84 RCW and RCW 12.20.060, in any action for damages where the amount pleaded by the prevailing party as hereinafter defined, exclusive of costs, is one thousand dollars or less, there shall be taxed and allowed to the prevailing party as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Puget Construction Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Christie-Lambert Van & Storage Co. v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  2. AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc. v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Harold Meyer Drug v. HurdCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  4. Kingston Lumber Supply Co. v. High Tech Development Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  5. Target National Bank v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API