Legal Opinion

Harold Meyer Drug v. Hurd

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 9, 1979No. 3257-2PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

Ceola Hurd appeals from an award of $10 in attorney's fees granted to her when she obtained dismissal of a drug store's suit against her. We increase the award to reflect more reasonably her attorney's efforts in both the Superior Court and the Court of Appeals.

Ms. Hurd's child was caught in Harold Meyer Drug Store with a $1.29 camera battery in his pocket. The store clerk confiscated the battery when the child could not produce a sales slip. No criminal charges were filed against the child, but the store filed a civil suit against Ms. Hurd under RCW 4.24.230(2) 1 a parental liability statute…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McKay v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Vannoy v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Tofte v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Davy v. MossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  5. Judges of Everett District Court v. HurdWashington Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Christie-Lambert Van & Storage Co. v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  3. Beckmann v. Spokane Transit AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Valley v. HandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. Wlasiuk v. Whirlpool Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API