Sean Brister v. Mich. Bell Telephone Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Elizabeth Jeup appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant in this action for retaliation in violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) and the Michigan Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act (“PWDCRA”). Because we find that the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Defendant was proper, we AFFIRM.
I
Jeup was an employee of Michigan Bell Telephone Co. (“Michigan Bell”), a company that provides telecommunications services under the AT&T brand, from 1999 until she left her employment in 2011.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pennsylvania State Police v. SudersSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Henry Dicarlo v. John E. Potter, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Eileen A. Logan v. Denny's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vonderhaar v. At&T Mobility Servs., LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
- Hans Kim v. Southern Ohio Medical Center, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
- Heard v. Field CoreDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
- Kristina Vonderhaar v. Amy WaymireCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Kristy Spann v. Tennessee Department of CorrectionDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.