Legal Opinion

Kristina Vonderhaar v. Amy Waymire

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 15, 2020No. 19-5332Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 20a0021n.06 No. 19-5332 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Jan 15, 2020 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk KRISTINA VONDERHAAR, ) ) Plaintiff–Appellant, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT v. ) COURT FOR THE EASTERN ) DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AMY WAYMIRE and AT&T MOBILITY ) SERVICES, LLC, ) ) OPINION Defendant–Appellees. ) ) BEFORE: MOORE, CLAY, and SUTTON, Circuit Judges. KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Kristina Vonderhaar accuses her erstwhile employer, AT&T Mobility Services, LLC (“AT&T”), of violating the Family and Medical…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania State Police v. SudersSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. Eileen A. Logan v. Denny's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Daniel R. Arban, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. West Publishing Corp., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API