Legal Opinion

People v. Andrews

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to the contention of defendant, Supreme Court was not required to obtain his consent to include statutory language on the verdict sheet to assist the jury in distinguishing among three counts of murder in the second degree (see, CPL 310.20 [2]). Defendant’s further contention that the court erred in failing to instruct the jury properly regarding the notations on the verdict sheet is not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. HalmNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. DworakowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. HammockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. TobiasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. People v. LaymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. People v. HicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. People v. PolomaineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API