Legal Opinion

State v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 14, 2013No. 101033810; A148109PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for delivery of cocaine, ORS 475.880, possession of cocaine, ORS 475.884, and tampering with physical evidence, ORS 162.295, and assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his suppression motion. He contends that the police violated Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution and the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution by unlawfully seizing him during a traffic stop. He further contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence that the police discovered when they conducted a search incident to arrest after…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API