Legal Opinion
Wolgamood v. Village of Constantine
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 14, 1940No. Docket No. 63, Calendar No. 40,669PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
On December 28,1936, the electors of the village of Constantine voted a bond issue in the sum of $107,000 for the purpose of building an electric lighting plant to be paid for out of the profits of the proposed plant. On February 5, 1937, the electors of the village of Constantine authorized a 20-year franchise to be exercised by the purchaser at a mortgage sale in event of foreclosure. The bonds were sold for $101,000, the project started, and at the end of the first year of operation, May 31, 1938, there was a loss of $6,516.70.
It appears that the village of-Constantine owned a piece of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bates v. City of HastingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Bacon v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Freeland v. City of SturgisMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Carrier v. State Administrative BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Rood v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Menendez v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Wolgamood v. Village of ConstantineMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Grand Rapids Independent Publishing Co. v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Baldwin Manor, Inc. v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- General Development Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.