Legal Opinion

Freeland v. City of Sturgis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1929No. Docket No. 115, Calendar No. 34,314PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from an order dismissing their bill of complaint filed to restrain the misapplication of the revenues received by the city of Sturgis from its municipally owned hydro-electric plant. The bill alleges that the city is operating under a special charter authorized by the home rule act (1 Comp. Laws 1915, § 3304 et seq.); that for 19 years it has owned and operated a hydro-electric plant furnishing light and power to its citizens; that, to acquire the plant, it issued bonds to the amount of $175,000, of which $93,000 are still outstanding; that its net receipts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Putnam v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Thomas v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Bates v. City of HastingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Callam v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Curtenius v. HoytMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Skutt v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Menendez v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Bacon v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Wolgamood v. Village of ConstantineMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Borah v. White County Bridge CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API